The US press have suffered about as many assaults this year as in the previous three years combined, the organization states in a new report. That rise is largely because whenever and wherever there is significant civil unrest (or rioting?), journalists cover it, which makes them more vulnerable to attacks. Add in the fact that most of them are liberal jerkoffs who get in the way of law enforcement people who are only trying to uphold the law, and there ya have it.
But anti- liberal, anti-one sided media sentiment from the genereal public and some more intuned public leaders has also increased hostility towards journalists, which can lead to more violence, and maybe, if they get smcked in the back of the head once in a while they'll learn to turn the level down a bit.
Now - you all know I would never be one to condone or encourage violence,
right? It's just that, well, you know if you know...
...
Need some last minute Christmas gift ideas?
...
ReplyDeleteyep.
the lying one sided media on both sides who are only trying to sell advertisements on TV or websites needs a good head smack every so often so that they know that we are watching them. its all about money, never forget that.
ReplyDeleteto tell the truth, most of them should be tarred and feathered and ridden out of town on a rail. as most of them are lying bastards. I have not trusted the so called "news" since the 1970's. and after seeing the Z film on the JFK "hit" I do not trust the damn Gov't clowns. YUP. saw the Z-film in 1978 in the dayroom in West Berlin. it was om West German TV. and at that time, there where about 10-12 "shooters"
ReplyDeletein the room watching it too. and that is when we KNEW the assholes where lying their asses off to us.
the "kill shot" came from in front of the car and low down. like from a storm drain, just like they trained us to fight from.
funny now isn't it ?
A lot of them need to go to jail for defrauding the public and covering up (abetting) crimes of politicians,
ReplyDeleteInterfere with ICE doing their jobs... I looked at the First Amendment, maybe they think freedom of the press thinks that means they can do anything they want. The same people will tell me that the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed doesn't mean what it says. I find that a bit inconsistent, but I can read.
ReplyDeleteGoogle "Obama targeting journalists" (to lengthy to cut-and-paste here).
ReplyDeleteThe vast majority of journalists are little more than political whores defending their guy and attacking the other guy. Was it The New York Times or the New Yorker that had a "meet your journalists" to beef up their reputation. Back fired tremendously. People realized what complete weirdo whack-jobs the journalists were.
I've never met a "journalist" that didn't need a damned good kicking!!
ReplyDelete"journalists" are quickly catching up to Lawyers in the "despicable" category. Further most of the so-called journalists are self-employed or work for a left-wing boutique pod cast enterprise.
ReplyDelete