Banning Gay Pride Flags for all the wrong reasons...

 Here's a story you just won't see in or on mainstream media, 'cause this judge just bowed down to Mecca. A federal judge has upheld a ban on gay pride flags after a years-long battle by an all-Muslim city council to remove the rainbow because it did not reflect their community's values. The court found that Hamtramck, an enclave surrounded by Detroit with a significant Muslim immigrant population, did not violate the US Constitution when it banned the flag from public buildings in 2023. 

After a pride flag was flown in the city during Pride Month in 2021 and 2022, the city council said it clashed with the beliefs of some residents, so they voted to allow only five flags to be flown on publicly-owned property.  US District Judge David Lawson, who was appointed by Bill Clinton, dismissed a lawsuit that was brought against the city for its flag restrictions, saying the ban was okay because the policy targeted all private flags. 

'Hamtramck's refusal to display the Gay Pride flag did not violate the Constitution,' the judge said. Hamtramck has a population of around 27,000, and more than 40% of its residents are immigrants. A large proportion of them are Muslim with Yemeni or Bangladeshi descent. 

 

So - he wouldn't have banned them for the straight white (and black) christians in his community who believe in the bible and  believe that homosexuality is immoral, but he'll suck Islamist dick just to appease an immigrant population from some fuckin' fourth world country? How ass-fuckin' backwards is his logic? Every day I'm more and more disenchanted with our legal system. Aren't you?

... 

A 32" TV with a Fire stick built in for that price?

...