Sunday, August 3, 2025

Trees are sexist? C'mon, man...

 
The idea of botanical sexism has been around since at least the midaughts, cyclically appearing each spring or summer alongside allergy season. “Male plants have been popular because they don’t produce messy fruit or seed pods—but they are responsible for most of the pollen in the air,” an NPR reporter wrote in a 2006 article.
 

If that ain't blatant sexism, nothing is. But then again, it was on NPR...

Skechers Men's Go Walk 7-Easy on 2 Sneaker
Marked down 35% today only



2 comments:

  1. Male tree & female tree = baby trees, how can you tell a trees sex? Don't care, they produce oxygen to breath, that's all that matters besides shade, yard work, pretty to look at in the fall.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That’s a good thing with the poplars (cottonwoods and aspens), as the female trees produce a lot of “cotton”.

    ReplyDelete

First, they lost the fat on Ozempic — now they’re harvesting human remains to get it back in the right places. And they wonder why we are confused...

This is a frightening new trend, and they're using terms like 'ethically harvested' to somehow justify taking fat from dead guys...