That self-winding perpetual-movement monstrosity strapped to your forearm is accurate across a hemisphere’s worth of time zones. But no matter how extravagantly handcrafted or precisely engineered your Rolex is, it’ll never be as accurate as a cheap digital gas station watch. Here’s why.
Both a Rolex Submariner and a $10 Casio can tell the time. They answer different needs; choose by which mix of accuracy, durability, status signaling, service cost, and ownership experience matters to you.
$10 quartz Casio: Typical quartz accuracy ±15 to ±30 seconds per month (often better in cheap modern modules). Extremely stable day-to-day, minimal drift, battery change every 2–10 years.
Rolex Submariner (automatic mechanical): COSC-certified variants run within −4/+6 seconds per day (though many Rolex movements perform closer to ±2–4 s/day in practice). Mechanical watches are inherently less stable than quartz and sensitive to position, temperature, and magnetism.
So there. For the record? I have a Rolex Oyster S/S in my jewelry box that I haven't worn in 20 years, at least. Think it might be time to cash that sucker in and take a trip to Switzerland with the proceeds. Juss' sayin'...
...
Have you ever tried one of these?
Use that water for your coffee or tea or whatever you need boiling water for.
Juss' sayin' - I like it. Click on the picture and get one for yourself.
This one is less than $ 24.00, but the one Barb bought last year cost over $ 40.00,
and they both do the same exact thing.
...



I have a Rolex Submariner that was last serviced 25 years ago. It only gets worn at weddings and funerals. It will loose about a half hour every day. It is going to need the extensive cleaning and a few scratches polished off the bracelet to get it back in good shape.
ReplyDeleteRolex's have come down in price significantly, had an offer on one my my Daytona's during the scamdemic for close to 100k now 35k. Should have dumped that sucker.
ReplyDeleteRolex vs Casio- your argument is the equivalent of saying that your cell phone takes a more accurate picture than Monet could ever paint.
ReplyDelete