In a six-page motion to dismiss the 2020 election interference case, prosecutors have decided to withdraw the case before his inauguration in January.
“It has long been the position of the Department of Justice that the United States Constitution forbids the federal indictment and subsequent criminal prosecution of a sitting President,” wrote Smith’s top deputy, Molly Gaston. “That prohibition is categorical and does not turn on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the Government’s proof, or the merits of the prosecution, which the Government stands fully behind,” she added.
The reality is, in the face of Kamala's loss, it's no longer politically expedient for him to continue. Make all the claims you want about constitution this and that - the reality is they never did have a case and they knew it. It was nothing more than partison badgering in it's worst form, and hopefully someone will hang this Jack Smith jerkoff by his balls in a town square somewhere. Juss' sayin'...
...
...
...
were a great treat to eat when we were kids.
Especially the mashed potatoes...
...
...
...
A near-consensus 73 percent of adults - or three in four Americans - say Donald Trump should prioritize the repatriation of illegal migrants
...
...
where I did most of my time in the Army.
WTF is a 'fort liberty' anyway, ferfucksake?
...
...
...
Are we not just getting to the point where every single thing
we hear coming out of California is asinine?
...
...
Here's a nice idea for a simple gift
that she'd really appreciate.
Remember, Christmas is coming soon...
Click on the picture for more information on this unique bracelet.
It's only $ 40.00 and that price includes free shipping!
...
Another blog I was reading noted the charges were "dismissed", not "dismissed with prejudice." Therefore after Trump left office, the charges could be reinstated if the Dems thought it expedient.
ReplyDelete