The court on Thursday ruled that "boneless wing" refers to "cooking style" and is not to be taken literally. The 4-3 ruling was peppered with dissent, with one judge calling the majority opinion "utter jabberwocky". But a majority of the judges considered being cautious of bones in a boneless wing to be common sense.
Writing for the majority, Justice Joseph T Deters said: "A diner reading ‘boneless wings’ on a menu would no more believe that the restaurant was warranting the absence of bones in the items than believe that the items were made from chicken wings, just as a person eating ‘chicken fingers’ would know that he had not been served fingers."
At the end of the day, the only reason anyone would actually endorse her or vote for her comes down to identity politics and nothing more. Policy-wise, the woman is a train wreck for our country if she goes ahead not only following the principles and practices of Big Joe but expanding on them. She's a no-bail, pro-immigration, defunding green-dealer from the gitgo...
...
...
...
I miss the good old days when Joltin' Joe Biden was in the news
every minute. Do we know if he's still alive or not?
...
If it's been a while since your brain exploded and you
need a tune-up, this'll do it for ya.
These people are truly cringe-worthy.
...
...
Here's a nice idea for a gift that's
both elegant and very affordable...
Click on the picture for more information on this beautiful bracelet.
It's a one of a kind gift - and it comes to you with free shipping!
...
...
The chicken "wing" craze was something that I didn't see coming. That shit was free finger-food during happy-hour in the 80's. No fucking way would I ever order it as a main entree.
ReplyDelete