Wednesday, February 8, 2023

How conveniently do they forget about Hunter?

WASHINGTON — A trio of former bigwigs at Twitter told the 
House Oversight Committee Wednesday they could not recall major facts about the decision to suppress The Post’s bombshell October 2020 stories on Hunter Biden’s laptop — though one claimed the decision was based in part on the social media giant’s own echo chamber rather than the demands of federal law enforcement.
Under questioning led by Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), former Twitter deputy general counsel James Baker, ex-head of trust and safety Yoel Roth and former policy director Vijaya Gadde took turns deflecting allegations of “collusion” between the FBI and Twitter to censor The Post.
“Simple question, did you talk to the FBI about the Hunter Biden story?” Jordan asked Baker point-blank at one point. “To the best of my recollection, I did not talk to the FBI about the Hunter Biden story before that day,” replied Baker, referencing Oct. 14, 2020, when The New York Post published the first of its world-exclusive reports. 
 

“Did you talk to them after?” Jordan pressed, to which Baker said, “I do not recall.” Moments later, as Jordan pressed further, Baker seemed to contradict himself: “Sitting here today, I don’t recall speaking with the FBI at all about the Hunter Biden matter - the laptop.”





1 comment:

  1. of course they don't recall. to say otherwise is going to land them in prison.
    BTW, saying I don't recall is safer for them than saying no. if they say no and then a email is found saying otherwise, they are fucked and they know it.

    ReplyDelete

Yes it is...