Monday, January 2, 2023

Proof once again that Rolling Stone magazine sucks - and for a bad reason, too...

Now granted, I'm not a fan of Celine Dion, but when you put Kurt Cobain on the list, include Ozzie, Sinatra doesn't even make the top 10, and Aretha is the greatest of all time, where is your credibility?
When Rolling Stone updated its 100 Greatest Singers list from 2008 with its new 200 Greatest Singers Of All Time, it fucked up royally. And while the roster of artists is extensive and varied, due in part to the change in criteria, there are a few questionable decisions that have outraged fans, but likely none more galvanizing than having Celine Dion left off the list . Known for her powerful and technically skilled vocals, the Canadian singer, 54, has also amassed more 200 million record sales worldwide, all while winning a slew of accolades and awards over her five decades in the limelight.
Buncha GenZ jerkoffs if ya ask me. The full story is here in the DailyMail:
And the full list in Rolling Stone can be found here:

Do you have a special occasion of some kind like 
a birthday, an anniversary or some other 
event worth celebrating coming up? 
 
Click on the picture above for information on this bracelet.  It's only $ 18.00 with free shipping.  
You can find something nice for your Mom, your wife, your daughter or your girlfriend right here: 
... 




2 comments:

  1. Rolling stone can kiss my ass. No Annie Lennox? If she was in there I missed her but, for my money, she has one of the BEST voices I've EVER heard.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Two things. Taylor Swift and Mick Jagger are talkers, not singers. When they do sing, it's mediocre. Second thing: No Pavarotti? Wow. Just wow.

    ReplyDelete